Realistically this is just a cheap way of trying to maximise dead space isn't it - it won't have cost much money to bolt on a few barriers, and they can simply be removed if no longer required (if we return to Barnet for example). So things like extending the roof, converting it into 'proper' terracing etc were always unlikely.EastBarnetFan wrote: ↑31 Jul 2024, 12:39 In an ideal world, they'd extend the roof but it is what it is.
You'll be up close to the pitch, no obstructions and from the back rows you'll get a solid view. Don't forget you'll be standing up so the angles will be better. Also right next to the new tunnel and the dugout as well.
The days of the old east terrace set up are gone and unless you're at an away fixture in an old ground, you'll never get that again at a Barnet match at home (sadly).
This is also a great new way to attract day trippers with a lower barrier to entry (cheaper tickets). I'll be moving over there going forward. Not so bothered by half-time pint tbh.
Let's bee positive!
Though it wouldn't necessarily appeal to me because of things previously mentioned (exposure to the elements, being restricted to one 'space' etc), I can't see any harm in this development at all. It offers a cheaper on the day ticket (or ST for that matter), will look better on the TV and should hopefully generate a bit of noise, right by the new tunnel.
One thing I should say though - you mention how the days of the East Terrace are gone unless you go to an old ground, but there's nothing stopping us from having a regular terrace at this level (in fact, I think it's all the way up to League One). Boston United have terracing in their stadium and it was only constructed in 2020, for example.
Saying that, it seems very unlikely that it'll be included in any South Underhill plans (or anything going forward at The Hive), as I believe it's harder to get funding for non-seated stands.