London Bees

Anything and everything related to Barnet FC
Uniman61
Posts: 3577
Joined: 22 Sep 2018, 10:43

London Bees

Post: # 359890Post Uniman61 »

Don't normally check results of London Bees, but was curious of how they had got on or how they were getting on and it's not looking good.
Results.
17-09-23= Ipswich 5-0 Bees
10-09-23 = Bees 1-6 Billericay
06-09-23 = Bees 0-3 MK Done
Oh dear not looking to bright for the ladies.
hoppy
Posts: 5338
Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 09:43

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382266Post hoppy »

It’s catching!
Women’s FA Cup, Steyning Town Community 0 6 London Bees.
Four different scorers and the fourth consecutive clean sheet.
letchbee94
Posts: 8323
Joined: 21 Jan 2011, 20:59

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382271Post letchbee94 »

Never mind, dont associate them with Barnet fc now anyway, If they was called Barnet ladies then yes.
But LB have different name differnt badge.
Sporting Barnet
Posts: 84
Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 12:33

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382280Post Sporting Barnet »

What a really poor reason for not backing the ladies team!

Sent from my SM-S906B using Tapatalk

LeytonBee
Posts: 175
Joined: 26 Mar 2024, 09:47

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382283Post LeytonBee »

letchbee94 wrote: 13 Oct 2024, 17:29 Never mind, dont associate them with Barnet fc now anyway, If they was called Barnet ladies then yes.
But LB have different name differnt badge.
:geahh: ya wot?
EastBarnetFan
Posts: 248
Joined: 16 Dec 2011, 16:30

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382315Post EastBarnetFan »

Letchbee94 does have a point here.

The badge is truly awful, like something from the 90s clipart with some famous London landmarks, and the name should be simply Barnet Ladies/Women FC. A graphic designer friend of mine said it was one of worst things he's seen professionally.

I get why TK would have done this, to broaden the appeal across London but he's ended up appealing to no one since the Prem teams all now have established and well supported women teams and the rebrand has effectively disassociated the women's team from the men's club and identity on purpose.
thebeekeeper
Posts: 546
Joined: 30 Oct 2019, 23:21

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382316Post thebeekeeper »

EastBarnetFan wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 12:16 Letchbee94 does have a point here.

The badge is truly awful, like something from the 90s clipart with some famous London landmarks, and the name should be simply Barnet Ladies/Women FC. A graphic designer friend of mine said it was one of worst things he's seen professionally.

I get why TK would have done this, to broaden the appeal across London but he's ended up appealing to no one since the Prem teams all now have established and well supported women teams and the rebrand has effectively disassociated the women's team from the men's club and identity on purpose.
Spot on, I can understand the intention behind the name change, but all it's done is alienate the only people who are likely to care about the team - Barnet fans. I would hope that we'll reverse this if we go back to Barnet. Even from a planning point of view, you would imagine a women's team carrying the Barnet name will be received positively by Barnet Council.
Jaydeebee
Posts: 622
Joined: 22 Sep 2020, 10:58

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382323Post Jaydeebee »

Has anyone actually put this point to TK before? Do the BFCSA cover London bees too? Seems like something that could be raised in discussion
ricardobee
Posts: 1665
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 11:50

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382325Post ricardobee »

Could never understand why the name was changed, isn’t there another team called London . . . ? Just confuses any random supporter wanting to support a ladies team. They are Barnet Ladies F.C. simple as that.
pgbee
Posts: 3789
Joined: 08 Mar 2011, 20:56

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382327Post pgbee »

It's the only women's team that I'm aware of that has no reference to the men's club it's attached to, in their name but I don't follow women's football, the Durham side I don't think is attached to Durham City because the men's side has been on a downward spiral for many years.
EastBarnetFan
Posts: 248
Joined: 16 Dec 2011, 16:30

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382328Post EastBarnetFan »

thebeekeeper wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 12:46
EastBarnetFan wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 12:16 Letchbee94 does have a point here.

The badge is truly awful, like something from the 90s clipart with some famous London landmarks, and the name should be simply Barnet Ladies/Women FC. A graphic designer friend of mine said it was one of worst things he's seen professionally.

I get why TK would have done this, to broaden the appeal across London but he's ended up appealing to no one since the Prem teams all now have established and well supported women teams and the rebrand has effectively disassociated the women's team from the men's club and identity on purpose.
Spot on, I can understand the intention behind the name change, but all it's done is alienate the only people who are likely to care about the team - Barnet fans. I would hope that we'll reverse this if we go back to Barnet. Even from a planning point of view, you would imagine a women's team carrying the Barnet name will be received positively by Barnet Council.
This is a great point, and could support the club's stadium application.

Purely from a PR perspective this would look great on Barnet Council to support the growth and development of the women's game.

I also do love how the Gherkin tower is in the badge even though these days it's completely hidden by new buildings and basically isn't the attraction it once was when first opened.
DerekRocholl
Posts: 4460
Joined: 02 Feb 2011, 16:59

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382329Post DerekRocholl »

pgbee wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 16:07 It's the only women's team that I'm aware of that has no reference to the men's club it's attached to, in their name but I don't follow women's football, the Durham side I don't think is attached to Durham City because the men's side has been on a downward spiral for many years.
London City Lionesses are currently second in the Women’s Championship.
hoofer2
Posts: 5564
Joined: 01 Feb 2011, 13:48

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382331Post hoofer2 »

pgbee wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 16:07 It's the only women's team that I'm aware of that has no reference to the men's club it's attached to, in their name but I don't follow women's football, the Durham side I don't think is attached to Durham City because the men's side has been on a downward spiral for many years.
I guess London City Lionesses are a breakaway club from Millwall...
hoofer2
Posts: 5564
Joined: 01 Feb 2011, 13:48

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382332Post hoofer2 »

I can see why TK rebranded District Line FC to London Bees. No real deep affiliation with Barnet and spent a lot of past closer to Harrow than Barnet
#Beebot
Posts: 5898
Joined: 04 Feb 2016, 19:54

Re: London Bees

Post: # 382336Post #Beebot »

hoofer2 wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 17:12
pgbee wrote: 14 Oct 2024, 16:07 It's the only women's team that I'm aware of that has no reference to the men's club it's attached to, in their name but I don't follow women's football, the Durham side I don't think is attached to Durham City because the men's side has been on a downward spiral for many years.
I guess London City Lionesses are a breakaway club from Millwall...
They are and being independent means they don't play second fiddle to a men's team. They are well funded by American owners.
Post Reply